One of the common misconceptions of ERP systems is that they provide out-of-the-box best practices that can be easily implemented.  In other words, the idea is that there is no need to re-engineer business processes when you can simply use the pre-configured best practices and let those drive new workflows.  As a CIO looking for ways to simplify your ERP implementation and mitigate risk, this is exactly what you want to hear, so it must be true.  Right?

Based on new data that we are about to publish from our 2011 ERP Report, that doesn’t seem to be the case.  According to our detailed study of nearly 200 implementations across the globe, the number of companies that adopted vanilla ERP software with no customization dramatically decreased from 28% in 2009 to 15% in 2010.  In other words, companies are actually customizing their ERP software solutions more now than they were a year ago.  This fact seems to counter much of the industry’s messaging highlighting the simplicity of Software as a Service (SaaS), pre-configured industry solutions, best practices, and other tools meant to calm the nerves of CIOs under mounting pressure to do more with less resources.

So how can this be?  There are a number of forces at play here, which we outline in our forthcoming report.

First, expectations are more unrealistic than ever.  As we see from these and other metrics outlined in the report, expectations of CIOs are not aligned with reality.  Much of these unrealistic expectations are driven by the market itself – again, every CIO wants to hear that their ERP vendor will allow them to implement with ease, at a low cost, and with minimal risk.  However, companies are overly optimistic about their ability to do this, which leads to problems later on.

Second, companies are more complex and ever-changing than they were a year ago . Mergers and acquisitions are increasing, staffs are more lean, and companies are starting to grow again, all of which put pressure on the simplified vanilla ERP software model.  After all, if your organization is growing and trying to outperform the competition, you probably don’t want to use generic software that everyone else is using, except perhaps in non-differentiating areas such as accounting or procurement.

This isn’t to say that you should follow the market and start customizing your ERP system simply because other organizations are.  However, it is important to realize that most companies do in fact have to customize their software to some degree, even with pre-configured workflows and best practices.  The key is to have realistic expectations and plan and budget accordingly.

In the meantime, watch for our upcoming 2011 report in early February and register for our upcoming ERP webinar that will summarize results from the study.

Posts You May Like:

Excel vs ERP: As Different as Night and Day

Excel vs ERP: As Different as Night and Day

Since its launch in 1985, Microsoft Excel has been the go-to business management software that executives around the world use to store and manage their day-to-day operational data.  However, brand recognition and longevity can only take an application so far. In the...

ERP Implementation Payback: When Might You Recoup the Cost of ERP?

ERP Implementation Payback: When Might You Recoup the Cost of ERP?

When you implement an ERP system, you naturally expect a return. This return is often in the form of increased profits and performance, through more efficient processes and smarter insights.  At a certain point, this return will counterbalance the money you spent on...